Observation: Ahab has finally died, and now Ahaziah is injured and wants to know if he will live. He sends the messenger to inquire of Baal-zebub, but instead Yahweh responds when Elijah intercepts the messenger and says that no, Ahaziah will die.
Baal-zebub means "lord of the flies". The outline of the modern novel by that same name is as follows:
-- Boys are stranded on an island.
-- Their only task is to keep a fire burning to signal rescue.
-- One other boy rebels, extinguishes the fire, and their camp divides into two.
-- The second camp begins worshiping a "beast" that doesn't actually exist.
-- Violence ensues when the second camp decides to kill the others.
-- As they totally destroy the island by fire, a man arrives to save them.
Obviously, the modern novel borrowed heavily from Israel and the divided kingdom. This is what has happened ... the northern kingdom divided away the Lord's priestly nation, rejected the burnt offerings done in the temple in favor of idols, worship completely false and non-existent gods, and respond to correction and wisdom from prophets with violence. Soon, their nation will be burned down and destroyed, and they'll have to wait for the one man - Jesus - to eventually come save everyone.
This is a book almost universally taught in schools still. It seems everyone has read it, and it has been made into movies multiple times. Literary critics and analysts describe it as a commentary on the animalistic tendencies of base human character, the lust for power, and a warning of how societal differences devolve into violence. Yet I have never, ever once heard it described as a modern fictional account of the divided kingdom of Israel, which is almost too obviously what it is.
Application: I was thinking of this the other day when I looked up information about biblical places and read the Wikipedia articles about them. The tone on information sites has changed. It used to be "this is in the bible, this is what the bible says, and this is other information from other historical or scientific sources." Then it was "this is in the bible, this is what the bible says, this is other information that other historical or scientific sources say, and we are actively editorializing about if and how these sources don't exactly align." Now the general tone is "this is factual information; there is also information in the bible but that's fictional so doesn't matter, and we are editorializing to tell that when the bible matches the facts it is only because the author of bible fiction borrowed from the facts." This isn't always quite this obvious, but it's there. Even for somethings as "factual" as mountains ... named in the bible, surrounded by events, that online sources then describe as "this is the mountain, its name comes from a story in the bible, but even though the bible says certain things occurred here there's no evidence of it so clearly that's a lie."
This is the reality we face ... the world rejects the written truth about - and from - the true Lord. The world rejects the bible. Even when the world studies biblical topics, it ignores and rejects the information, and therefore misses the lessons and the wisdom of the Lord.
Prayer: Lord, I know only one true and reliable source of truth in this world, and it is your word. I cling to you as my only source of absolute truth. May I be strong enough in the spirit today to be in your word, relying on your direction, instruction, and correction. Please, send your Holy Spirit to help me, for I am too weak on my own. Amen.